in reply to Secure Perlmonks

Would you feel more comfortable with Digest authentication? I realize it's not as secure as 128-bit SSL, but it's better than cookies or Basic authentication.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Secure Perlmonks
by dws (Chancellor) on Jul 09, 2003 at 15:44 UTC
    Would you feel more comfortable with Digest authentication? I realize it's not as secure as 128-bit SSL, but it's better than cookies or Basic authentication.

    Correct me if my information is out-of-date, but when last I looked (a year or so ago), support for Digest authentication was missing from most browsers. Which browsers support it now?

[reply]
Re: Re: Secure Perlmonks
by PodMaster (Abbot) on Jul 09, 2003 at 15:19 UTC
    Yes.

    MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
    I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
    ** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion