in reply to legality of extracting content from websites

Hmmm ... there really is no difference between: I think this is part of the risk associated with any advertising - wether online or off. You think those little cards fall out of magazines is just accidental? Those cards fall out because it forces you to pick it up and look at it. Bingo, the advertise now has your attention.

Advertisers are well aware of the risks associated with online and offline campaigns. They're aware that not everyone who is delivered an ad is actually going to see an ad. Sure, they're not happy about it (ala Tivo) but they're going to have to change.

So my $0.02USD is go ahead and scrape ... it's not copy-righted material, it's your email (right, it is yours right). Let Yahoo and it's advertisers fight over the biz implications of a non-effective campaign. At worst, all they can do really is deny you service. Big deal, get another one.

Or just bypass those services all together and buy yourself a web-hosting package. Those can be had for as little as $50USD a year and include email addresses. I use one of those so I can more easily switch ISPs (no need to worry about lock-in due to ISP controlled addresses).

-derby

  • Comment on Re: legality of extracting content from websites

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: legality of extracting content from websites
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Jul 15, 2003 at 13:46 UTC
    Well, the email is copyrighted, but neither Yahoo, nor the receiver of the email has the copyright - that right belongs to the sender. So, you can't use copyright as an argument to bypass Yahoo's or Hotmails interface.

    I'm not sure whether perlmonks is the appropriate place to seek legal advice. This is a Perl site, mostly populated by people who only know how they would like the law to be, and not by people with a legal training. If you try to do something of which you suspect you might break a law, consult a lawyer. His/her professional advice is far more useful than anything you find here.

    Having said that, IMO, 'screen scraping' falls in the same category as 'framing someone elses pages'. And I know lawsuits where people who framed other peoples pages lost.

    What I don't understand is why someone who's technically capable to screen scrape uses yahoo and hotmail addresses.

    Abigail