in reply to legality of extracting content from websites
Advertisers are well aware of the risks associated with online and offline campaigns. They're aware that not everyone who is delivered an ad is actually going to see an ad. Sure, they're not happy about it (ala Tivo) but they're going to have to change.
So my $0.02USD is go ahead and scrape ... it's not copy-righted material, it's your email (right, it is yours right). Let Yahoo and it's advertisers fight over the biz implications of a non-effective campaign. At worst, all they can do really is deny you service. Big deal, get another one.
Or just bypass those services all together and buy yourself a web-hosting package. Those can be had for as little as $50USD a year and include email addresses. I use one of those so I can more easily switch ISPs (no need to worry about lock-in due to ISP controlled addresses).
-derby
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: legality of extracting content from websites
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Jul 15, 2003 at 13:46 UTC |