in reply to Re: Re: So, Netscape is dead?
in thread So, Netscape is dead?

Update Well, I guess I shouldn't give out legal advice anymore... ; )

Some company couldn't sell Perl, the GPL prevents that. Unless Larry and everyone who has ever contributed to perl (the interpretor, etc.) agreed to release Perl under something other than the GPL, Perl is safe from being sold by companies.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: So, Netscape is dead?
by tilly (Archbishop) on Jul 18, 2003 at 00:57 UTC
    Wrong. ActiveState sells Perl, and sells proprietary extensions to Perl. Not always with source code.

    How do they do that? Quite easily. Perl is dual-licensed under the GPL and the Artistic License - receiver's choice. ActiveState chooses the Artistic License. If you don't agree with those licensing terms, then you are free to not contribute to Perl...

[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: So, Netscape is dead?
by Anonymous Monk on Jul 17, 2003 at 22:11 UTC

    I'm not a lawyer, this is not legal advice, blah blah blah.

    First off, the GPL allows anyone to sell the work in question - they just have to provide the source and allow everyone else the same rights. I could sell you the linux kernel right now for $10000 (or any other amount) and I could still be in compliance with the license (I'll even give you a 10% discount if you buy within the next 10 minutes!).

    Secondly, Perl is dual licensed, under both the GPL and the artistic license, right? So what does that mean? It means that I can choose which one I accept (I'm a little sketchy here, but that's my interpretation, corrections are most welcome). So for someone looking to 'acquire' Perl, the GPL is irrelevant. Like a windows machine on a network, the artistic license is a weaker point of attack.

    But like I said, don't lose any sleep over it :)

[reply]

In Section Meditations