in reply to Re^2: Pseudo-switch question (bull)
in thread Pseudo-switch question

Mind giving an example? I've never seen it break code, unless you try to break it on purpose. And just because a module is implemented a bit oddly dosen't mean it's a gag module.
  • Comment on Re: Re^2: Pseudo-switch question (bull)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^4: Pseudo-switch question (bull)
by tye (Sage) on Jul 22, 2003 at 18:41 UTC

    A quick search turned up Switch.pm gotchas? but there was also a thread just a couple of days ago where __DATA__ just doesn't work if you use Switch.

    I have no desire to use such so I don't keep up-to-date on exactly why I shouldn't.

    And just because a module is implemented a bit oddly dosen't mean it's a gag module.

    Thanks for guessing at what my reasons for thinking it should be renamed are. Sorry, wrong guess. Would you like to try again? Oh, wait! I already gave my reason. Imagine that.

                    - tye
[reply]
[d/l]
Re^4: Pseudo-switch question (bull)
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Jul 23, 2003 at 01:40 UTC
[reply]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom