in reply to Re: Minimal password checking: a summary
in thread Minimal password checking: a summary
Yesterday night I worked on your suggestion: unfortunately there are many symbols that cannot be mapped uniquely; for example the number 1 could well be mapped to 'l' and 'i' and 'I'; the same holds for other symbols that could be mapped to more than one letter. Taking each and every possibile combination could take a lot of time, and you are always leaving something out.
That's why I chose not to implement it even in a simple form. But if you have some efficient code that takes into account the special cases, you are welcome :-)
Ciao!
--bronto
The very nature of Perl to be like natural language--inconsistant and full of dwim and special cases--makes it impossible to know it all without simply memorizing the documentation (which is not complete or totally correct anyway).
--John M. Dlugosz
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re: Minimal password checking: a summary
by dbwiz (Curate) on Jul 30, 2003 at 13:07 UTC | |
by bronto (Priest) on Aug 08, 2003 at 13:41 UTC | |
by larsen (Parson) on Aug 08, 2003 at 13:45 UTC |