Re: Re: Be more OO with "Class" modules?

We just talked about this here. You should avoid the try/catch syntax, in my opinion. Exception::Class or Error without the special syntax are both good though.

Comment on Re: Re: Be more OO with "Class" modules?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Be more OO with "Class" modules? by Anonymous Monk on Jul 30, 2003 at 23:09 UTC
"You should avoid the try/catch syntax, in my opinion" Could you please explain your reasoning? I'm not disagreeing with you per se, just curious as to why.	[reply]
Re: Re: Re: Re: Be more OO with "Class" modules? by edoc (Chaplain) on Jul 30, 2003 at 23:19 UTC
Memory leaks.... Building a Large-scale E-commerce Site with Apache and mod_perl cheers, J	[reply]
Re^4: Be more OO with "Class" modules? by adrianh (Chancellor) on Jul 30, 2003 at 23:21 UTC
The reasons to avoid try/catch have already been discussed on the thread perrin mentioned.	[reply]