in reply to Funny Messages in OSS

Another point that should be explored here is should these messages exist? Does it damage a project's reputation to have these messages? Does it decrease it's usefulness? Or is it all just in good fun?

I've seen a lot of strange parts to documentation as well, for example in A Linux Kernel HOWTO document listed as reasons to compile a kernel are:

I personally think that's taking it a bit overboard, but then again, they spent the time to write the HOWTO, I didn't.

Opinions?

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Funny Messages in OSS
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Aug 02, 2003 at 21:11 UTC

    I see it as a geekier form of easter eggs. To my knowledge, easter eggs have done no harm to the products they were found it. So…

    Makeshifts last the longest.

      How do you know they've done no harm? I'm sure there have been examples (probably rare) where they've caused security or stability issues. At best they add bloat (think certain programs with embedded flight simulators) and confuse the user with meaningless error messages.