in reply to Re: Re: Re: A case for neutral votes
in thread A case for neutral votes

I disagree. I think a reply with a reference link can be just as useful as an answer that reveals and discusses the answer. I downvote unhelpful, flippant answers, and incomplete answers that were obviously dashed off in order to make it to be first post. I don't downvote a reply that's just a link .. sometimes, in order to solve a problem, a link to the right page is all that's necessary.

--t. alex
Life is short: get busy!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re(4): A case for neutral votes
by sauoq (Abbot) on Aug 09, 2003 at 23:23 UTC
    I disagree.

    You disagree with what? My statement that such replies might be helpful to the community but that I often downvote them?

    I suppose you are trying to say that you disapprove¹ of my choice to do so, which is fine, but then I didn't ask and I'll still vote the way I think is best.

    1. Disagreement is not synonymous with disapproval. You disagree with what one thinks. You disapprove of what one does.

    -sauoq
    "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";