in reply to
RFC - inplace upgrade for Tie::SortHash
Hmmm. Why not
Tie::IxHash
? That's what I've always used.
Comment on
Re: RFC - inplace upgrade for Tie::SortHash
Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: RFC - inplace upgrade for Tie::SortHash
by
Limbic~Region
(Chancellor)
on Aug 10, 2003 at 02:38 UTC
perrin
,
Because it just preserves the insertion order and allows you to do a simple sort by value or keys. It doesn't allow an arbitrary sort of a complex hash. It also doesn't allow re-ordering on the fly.
Cheers -
L~R
[reply]
In Section
Meditations