in reply to Re: Programming and math
in thread Programming and math
That's not math, that's symbolic logic! (Which, to be fair, a lot of people learn in math classes.) And even though De Morgan probably had some mathematical application in mind, De Morgan's rules are a reformulation of some of Occam's teachings, which (al)most certainly did not have mathematics as their basis. And while knowing about finite state automata may be useful for some applications, I don't really see them as something that can't be learned along the way, should a programmer ever need to know how to implement them. In any case, a lot of smart programmers come up with this kind of thing on their own and are often surprised to hear it has a name. :)
(That said, possessing more knowledge only enhances your ability to solve problems.)
--
Allolex
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Re: Programming and math
by Boots111 (Hermit) on Aug 11, 2003 at 01:41 UTC | |
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Aug 11, 2003 at 13:17 UTC | |
|
Re: Re: Re: Programming and math
by Anonymous Monk on Oct 03, 2003 at 20:47 UTC | |
by allolex (Curate) on Oct 03, 2003 at 20:51 UTC |