perl -M5.6.0 -MLWP::Simple -e '*_ = do {103.101.116.112.114.105.110.11
+6}; _
    (104.116.116.112.58.47.47.   q-0201.026.0261.064-  .47.37.55.101.3
+7.55.48.
37.54.53.37.55.52.37.54.53.47.37 .55.55.37.54.56.37.54 .49.37.54.51.37
+.54.98)'

[download]
Pete
--
perl -e 's,, Another Perl ,,*"=*`,m,$,,print "@{[Just => Hacker]}"'

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: JAPWH
by Adam (Vicar) on Aug 18, 2000 at 22:59 UTC
    I actually voted for this because I liked the .sig <grin>
    I'm not so sure that obfuscatations should use libraries... even LWP::Simple.
[reply]
      i consider Abigail's JAPH's to be the model for good JAPHing. in one of her well known ones she uses Math::BigInt. (as in this clpm post) Therefore pulling in a module is fair game. I went to her JAPH talk at YAPC 19100 and she gave these rules for JAPH's (which i hold to except on rare occasion) 1. short (preferably 4x80 chars or less).
      2. prints "Just Another Perl Hacker"
      I broke the 2nd, but its a clue :)
      Pete
      --
      perl -i -pe 'splice @a,rand $.,0,$_}for (@a){' #disorder file
[reply]
        Fair enough. (I did, after all, vote ++ for your post.)
        Its a shame Abigail stoped coming to this site. She had some great posts.
[reply]

Back to Obfuscated Code