in reply to Perl webserver

I think a bare bones Apache would be better: it's smaller and safer.

Ciao, Valerio

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Perl webserver
by bean (Monk) on Aug 19, 2003 at 19:33 UTC
    I'll second this. I once prototyped a message server in Perl and then rewrote it in C - the C version was at least an order of magnitude faster, and used considerably less memory. Of course, the C version was leaner in design partly because it is so much work to do _anything_ in C, but still... The point is, vanilla Apache takes up less than 2Mb and is fast, efficient, and well-tested.