Re: Gosh, it broke! - Tk and recent EU::MM.

in reply to Gosh, it broke! - Tk and recent EU::MM.

++ but:

...PLEASE consider these patches...

Is this the right place to ask for consideration of patches?

Just newbie wondering, really... ;-)

Liz

Comment on Re: Gosh, it broke! - Tk and recent EU::MM.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
2Re: Gosh, it broke! - Tk and recent EU::MM. by jeffa (Bishop) on Aug 23, 2003 at 14:59 UTC
The Monastery is not really the wrong place for this, but RT-CPAN is probably the better place for patches: http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bugs.html?Dist=Tk jeffa L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)	[reply]
Re^3: Gosh, it broke! - Tk and recent EU::MM. by Intrepid (Curate) on Aug 26, 2003 at 05:56 UTC
Done. Filed as ticket No. 3334. Good suggestion. Soren/Intrepid -- use PerlMonk::Tye qw(:wisely);	[reply]
Re: Re: Gosh, it broke! - Tk and recent EU::MM. by hossman (Prior) on Aug 23, 2003 at 18:35 UTC
I don't think you are parsing his whole sentence as intended... PLEASE consider these patches, especially the latter patchsection which alters pod2man, to be more of a proposition and an exposition than advised. In other words, he is deliberately pointing out that these patches are not advised (for most people). He's merely laying them out there as an example of what he had to do, so other people can ponder the issue and see what's what.	[reply]

In Section Meditations