No, it fully works. The error in pass two is a logic error. This means, it doesn't do what I wanted. The first pass does what I want, and even passes strict. My problems were: A) a failure to grok that closures were using a deeply linked reference, and not a copy, and B) a failure to understand that for (;;) is not at all the same as for(), the latter doing what I would expect of it in each case.

Paris Sinclair    |    4a75737420416e6f74686572
pariss@efn.org    |    205065726c204861636b6572
http://sinclairinternetwork.com