in reply to Re: Removing underline tags with regexp (is a good idea)
in thread Removing underline tags with regexp
I understand your rant grinder, but if you have been following Tricky's problems ... you see that he just keeps adding more to the list of items to be removed from his HTML. Pretty soon his list of regexes is going to be hairy. But then again, maybe this is better for new-comers ... you don't really appreciate a good thing until you really need it. ;)u { text-decoration: none; }
UPDATE:
From Tricky's home node:
I aim to complete my MSc project by Jan 2004, which involves parsing HTML pages in a proxy server, stripping tags which impede Web access for visually impaired people (including dyslexics and colour blind), and returning to the client.Yep, sounds like Tricky sure could use HTML::Santizer or HTML::Scrubber ... but i would be tempted to slay this dragon with XML::LibXML and XML::LibXSLT myself ...
jeffa
L-LL-L--L-LL-L--L-LL-L-- -R--R-RR-R--R-RR-R--R-RR B--B--B--B--B--B--B--B-- H---H---H---H---H---H--- (the triplet paradiddle with high-hat)
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: 2Re: Removing underline tags with regexp (is a good idea)
by Elian (Parson) on Sep 02, 2003 at 13:23 UTC | |
by jeffa (Bishop) on Sep 02, 2003 at 13:46 UTC | |
by Elian (Parson) on Sep 02, 2003 at 14:00 UTC |