in reply to Re: print (...) interpreted as function
in thread print (...) interpreted as function

I was hoping it would spark some discussion about whether the it's a good idea to remove the warning or not.

Next time, please let us know your intentions. This can be as simple as "I'd like to know what you think about this issue", as long as it's not in the re-post itself, but in the text around it. I thought you were just drawing attention to your plea by posting it in several locations.

Juerd # { site => 'juerd.nl', plp_site => 'plp.juerd.nl', do_not_use => 'spamtrap' }

  • Comment on Re: Re: print (...) interpreted as function

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: print (...) interpreted as function
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Sep 02, 2003 at 15:19 UTC
    Next time, please let us know your intentions. This can be as simple as "I'd like to know what you think about this issue", as long as it's not in the re-post itself, but in the text around it.

    I thought that was obvious from the fact it was posted in Meditations and not Perl News.

    Abigail

[reply]
      Howdy!

      Your intentions were a bit too obtuse. It clearly was not obvious to the rest of us (certianly not to me).

      yours,
      Michael

[reply]
Re: Re: Re: print (...) interpreted as function
by Anonymous Monk on Sep 04, 2003 at 15:50 UTC

    I would add something insightful in this reply but you didn't specifically ask for my opinion, so I won't. Please let me know in your post next time what your intentions are.

    Some things are implied :)

[reply]

      I wonder why posts like yours are always done by anonymous cowards. My guess is that you DO have an account and fear loss of XP.

[reply]

In Section Meditations