in reply to MySQL C API vs. DBI for performance (was Re: Re: Inheritance in XS modules?)
in thread Inheritance in XS modules?

One is the fact that the DBI doco itself IIRC says right in it that the DBI interface is not horribly efficient.

Actually the DBI documentation says the complete opposite. From the FAQ "How fast is the DBI?":

... DBI and DBD::Oracle overheads are small compared with Perl language overheads (and probably database overheads).

This matches my experience. If DBI isn't fast enough your problem is almost certainly IO, hardware or the choice of Perl as the implementation language. DBI was designed for speed - I doubt you'll see much improvement without moving most of your application onto the XS side.

If you've not read it already I'd give Tim's DBI Advanced Talk a look over. It has lots of relevant tips on getting the most from DBI.

  • Comment on Re: MySQL C API vs. DBI for performance (was Re: Re: Inheritance in XS modules?)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: MySQL C API vs. DBI for performance (was Re: Re: Inheritance in XS modules?)
by blue_cowdawg (Monsignor) on Sep 10, 2003 at 01:53 UTC

        If DBI isn't fast enough your problem is almost certainly IO, hardware or the choice of Perl as the implementation language.
    I/O and hardware, unfortunately in this case, is out of my control. Hosted ISP site. Even the version of Perl is something I'm locked into. Version 5.005_03 and I'm sure not the latest and greatest DBI.

    Maybe I should just leave this project as an intellectual excersize. Still it might make a great PM Mediation when I do the benchmarks... :-)


    Peter L. Berghold -- Unix Professional
    Peter at Berghold dot Net
       Dog trainer, dog agility exhibitor, brewer of fine Belgian style ales. Happiness is a warm, tired, contented dog curled up at your side and a good Belgian ale in your chalice.