in reply to Re: Using LWP::Simple with a callback (progress indicator)
in thread Using LWP::Simple with a callback (progress indicator)

Heh, odd... I do have the error checking in the version here at home. I'll edit that. (Done — in a slightly unusual manner :))

As for the rest... *waves hand* this is just a snippet. You have to know when this stuff matters.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Using LWP::Simple with a callback (progress indicator)

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Using LWP::Simple with a callback (progress indicator)
by barrd (Canon) on Sep 16, 2003 at 11:42 UTC
    Okey cokey bart,
    Sorry, didn't realise it was intended as a snippet. Please accept my apologies but I was just trying to point out some common errors for any 'newbies' who may have read it. I am not of course implying that you are a 'newbie' :).

    Peace, ~barrd

    Update:

    (Done — in a slightly unusual manner :))
    Indeed, I've never seen it done "that" way before ;)