Re: The costs of packages

lots of different 'types', literally hundreds

What is that ? Why do you need hundreds of types ? Could you give an example type ? Just curious, Murat

Comment on Re: The costs of packages

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: The costs of packages by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 17, 2003 at 06:49 UTC
As Anonymonk you probably didn't get shown this post, which explains a little more. The "types" in question are C structures and unions. Look through the header files for your OS and depending which one you use, you'll see just how many there are. Examine what is said, not who speaks. "Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham "When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller If I understand your problem, I can solve it! Of course, the same can be said for you.	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: The costs of packages
by BrowserUk (Patriarch) on Sep 17, 2003 at 06:49 UTC

As Anonymonk you probably didn't get shown this post, which explains a little more.

The "types" in question are C structures and unions. Look through the header files for your OS and depending which one you use, you'll see just how many there are.

Examine what is said, not who speaks.

"Efficiency is intelligent laziness." -David Dunham
"When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." -Richard Buckminster Fuller
If I understand your problem, I can solve it! Of course, the same can be said for you.

[reply]