in reply to Content "Censorshop" : Kid friendliness
Man, you could be sooo screwed.
1. What *exactly* qualifies as "family and kid friendly"? This one is tougher to answer than it at first appears.That's an understatement. My take is that the people who are most adamant about "family and kid friendly" have a particular axe to grind that is far more restrictive than one might expect from a broad survey. Who is defining "family and kid friendly"? For your own sake, you need a usable definition to cover your butt.
3. How can non-text items like .jpg, .doc, .pdf, etc. be checked, if they can in fact be checked in some automated fashion. This just seems doubtful to me in my current state of ignorance.Automated checking is a "hard problem". I like the suggestion of community evaluation. It then becomes a direct application of "community standards" in the most useful sense.
4. Are there online "bad-word" lists? If so, what about other languages and localization? what about slang? innuendo?Community policing will address this using the local standards instead of some arbitrary, external "standard" (and I'm using scare quotes there).
Good luck with this. Perhaps you could do something with the Everything Engine.
yours,
Michael
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Content "Censorshop" : Kid friendliness
by knexus (Hermit) on Sep 20, 2003 at 18:48 UTC | |
by BUU (Prior) on Sep 20, 2003 at 19:45 UTC | |
by knexus (Hermit) on Sep 20, 2003 at 21:57 UTC |