in reply to Re: Re: use of constants in regex substitutions?
in thread use of constants in regex substitutions?

You're right; I should've tested first. How come &sub is interpolated when using arrow operator?
&sub => "xyz";
AFAIK, this is equivalent to
"&sub", "xyz";

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: use of constants in regex substitutions?
by edan (Curate) on Sep 23, 2003 at 14:32 UTC

    Well, I believe the => operator forces a bareword to its left to be interpreted as a string. But &sub isn't a bareword it's a subroutine call, so it works like you want it to. At least, this is my understanding. Hopefully someone will correct me if I'm wrong.

    --
    3dan