Sure, you could use one of those. But, why would you?

Actually I'd rate the second one ( without the $" || "" ) as the preferred way to go. I don't tend to like interpolating arrays in anything other than quick and dirty code. If I'm going to output a list I prefer a more distinct end of field character than a space.

But I _did_ put a smiley face on my node dude... :-)

But I _did_ put a smiley face on my node dude... :-)

Oh, I did see the smiley; it's just in my nature to take such suggestions seriously, I guess. Particularly when they come from you, demerphq.

Although I'm not prejudiced against array interpolation in strings, I'm perfectly happy with using join() instead. (I do agree that avoiding $"||"" is better; it's ugly and prevents joining with "0".)

But, your first suggestion made me shudder.

:-)

-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";

(I do agree that avoiding $"||"" is better; it's ugly and prevents joining with "0".)

Yeah it should be $" // "" or defined $" ? $" : "", but you wouldn't do that normally. :-)

But, your first suggestion made me shudder.

That was the point. :-) Seriously tho, that trick can be useful, interpolating constants (which really is calling subs) inside of a string, or more specifically a here doc can be nicer than precalculating and interpolating in.


---
demerphq



First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
-- Gandhi