in reply to Re: Re: div tag in signatures
in thread div tag in signatures

You're assuming the "surprised use" actually cares to look at the source. Meanwhile you're wasting those bytes umpteen times a day...

In any event, it seems a perhaps more useful case to include in the code is for people like Abigail-II... no div if no sig.

--
I'm not belgian but I play one on TV.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: div tag in signatures
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Sep 29, 2003 at 11:00 UTC

    You're assuming the "surprised use" actually cares to look at the source.

    No im not. The comment would show up in the text box the user would edit their text in.

    no div if no sig.

    Please reread the node you replied to more carefully. Sepcifically the line that says

      It doesnt add the tag to users without an automatic node signature/template,

    As i told perrin, and mentioned there, the patches I posted don't add the tags to people without an automatic signature template.


    ---
    demerphq

      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
      -- Gandhi

[reply]
[d/l]
      What about Anonymous Monk? He has a nice 
      <div class="pmsig_961">

</div>

      [download]
      waiting for him.
[reply]
[d/l]

        IF my patch is applied this will not happen. Jeeze. How many times do I have to say the same thing guys? Read the thread before you post. :-)


        ---
        demerphq

          First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
          -- Gandhi

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion