in reply to Re3: split to get the dir name
in thread split to get the dir name

Just curious, how is substr platform-dependent? And how is ls not platfrom-dependent?

Nonsense. You never liked me anyway. You wouldn’t even come to my birthday party!

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re5: split to get the dir name
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Sep 29, 2003 at 19:30 UTC
    The output of 'ls -l' is dependent on which *nix you're using. Hence, the index into substr will change depending on the *nix you run on. 'ls -l' is actually not as platform-dependent as you think. It runs on Win2003Pro ...

    ------
    We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

    The idea is a little like C++ templates, except not quite so brain-meltingly complicated. -- TheDamian, Exegesis 6

    Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.

      So substr is platform dependent because it is being used with ls which is not as platform-dependent as I think?

      * blink *

      Gee, and I thought you were stupid.
        • The usage of substr with 'ls -l' results in an index that is platform-dependent.
        • The 'ls' command is supported on more than just *nix platforms. How it is implemented (especially the -l flag) is is platform-dependent. It's also locale-dependent.

        ------
        We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

        The idea is a little like C++ templates, except not quite so brain-meltingly complicated. -- TheDamian, Exegesis 6

        Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.