in reply to Using DBI::clone()
...well, each child is doing exactly the same thing immediately after the fork, so each one of those HASH(0x74fc2c) thingies is at the same address in the address space of each process, but not the same physical address. At least that is how I see it...
It suggests that memory allocation is very deterministic. :)
yours,
Michael
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: Re: Using DBI::clone()
by simonm (Vicar) on Sep 30, 2003 at 17:44 UTC |