Re: Re: Interpolation in character class

That seems to generate a "variable length lookbehind not implemented" error :( Also, I don't understand why we are looking *behind*, don't we want to test the second string character with look *ahead* ? If so, how do we confine the lookahead test to only the *next* character ? Doesn't it look all the way to the end of the string ? Thanks, Scott.

Comment on Re: Re: Interpolation in character class

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Interpolation in character class by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Oct 02, 2003 at 18:01 UTC
That'll teach me to blab about features I don't know without testing them first. Yes, positive lookahead would definitely be possible. You'd have to flip your test, though. `$x = 'aba'; print $x =~ /(.)(?=\1)/ ? "double!\n" : "not double!\n"; $x = 'abba'; print $x =~ /(.)(?=\1)/ ? "double!\n" : "not double!\n"; ---- not double! double!` [download] ------ We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age. The idea is a little like C++ templates, except not quite so brain-meltingly complicated. -- TheDamian, Exegesis 6 Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.	[reply] [d/l]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re: Re: Re: Interpolation in character class
by dragonchild (Archbishop) on Oct 02, 2003 at 18:01 UTC

$x = 'aba';
 
print $x =~ /(.)(?=\1)/
        ? "double!\n"
        : "not double!\n";
 
$x = 'abba';
print $x =~ /(.)(?=\1)/
        ? "double!\n"
        : "not double!\n";
----
not double!
double!
[download]

------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

The idea is a little like C++ templates, except not quite so brain-meltingly complicated. -- TheDamian, Exegesis 6

Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.

[reply]
[d/l]