•Re: File Based Throttling

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: File Based Throttling by idsfa (Vicar) on Oct 17, 2003 at 16:44 UTC
For the canonical definition of Unix, it's a required utility. atcroft is probably correct about the pathing issue. But then, you already knew that. Remember, when you stare long into the abyss, you could have been home eating ice cream.	[reply]
Re: •Re: File Based Throttling by atcroft (Abbot) on Oct 17, 2003 at 16:32 UTC
My guess is that it may be on the system, but just not in the path. Tried it as well, and on my home linux machine, I found it as /sbin/fuser ; on Solaris 7 and 8 machines I have access to, it was /usr/sbin/fuser. YMMV, however.	[reply]
•Re: Re: •Re: File Based Throttling by merlyn (Sage) on Oct 17, 2003 at 17:46 UTC
Nope, it's nowhere. `[localhost:~] merlyn% man fuser No manual entry for fuser` [download] This is Mac OSX, which is Mach/BSD based, arguably more "unix" than Linux is, because there are parts that were sold under the Unix label, unlike Linux. `fuser` is definitely definitely not-portable. And there's really nothing portable to replace it, either. -- Randal L. Schwartz, Perl hacker Be sure to read my standard disclaimer if this is a reply.	[reply] [d/l]
Re: •Re: File Based Throttling by sweetblood (Prior) on Oct 17, 2003 at 17:11 UTC
Even if you were to find fuser it is usually only available to root.	[reply]
Re: Re: •Re: File Based Throttling by vek (Prior) on Oct 17, 2003 at 21:16 UTC
Even if you were to find fuser it is usually only available to root. Er, that's not strictly true, any user can run `fuser`. I'm just a joe schmo user on a Solaris 9 box: `[vek@alyssa - /home/vek]% fuser -u . .: 2053c(vek) 2017c(vek) 1351c(vek)` [download] -- vek --	[reply] [d/l] [select]