in reply to Re: Image::Magick Annotate() doesn't look good
in thread Image::Magick Annotate() doesn't look good

I tried it in Word and it looked just as crappy. I really don't want to create images of each character and clean it up, but it's looking like I'm going to have to do that. *cries*

------
We are the carpenters and bricklayers of the Information Age.

The idea is a little like C++ templates, except not quite so brain-meltingly complicated. -- TheDamian, Exegesis 6

... strings and arrays will suffice. As they are easily available as native data types in any sane language, ... - blokhead, speaking on evolutionary algorithms

Please remember that I'm crufty and crochety. All opinions are purely mine and all code is untested, unless otherwise specified.

  • Comment on Re2: Image::Magick Annotate() doesn't look good