in reply to Re: Re: Obscuring sensitive data in your scripts
in thread Obscuring sensitive data in your scripts

Finally, I can only interpret your answers (perceived tone and lack of a real identity) as rudeness, which I believe does not have a place in the monastery. If you do not agree to a point, it is usually a well respected practice to elaborate your answers and provide reasonable alternatives. This also allows the comunity to identify your views with an identity, giving you a chance to see for yourself how your opinions fare among the rest of us.
I think the fact that your original post sits at -11 on worst nodes of the week, and neither of the anonymous replies seems to have gone sub-zero is a reasonable indicator of how things have fared among the rest of the community.
  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Obscuring sensitive data in your scripts

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Obscuring sensitive data in your scripts
by fokat (Deacon) on Oct 21, 2003 at 18:28 UTC

    Best regards

    I think the fact that your original post sits at -11 on worst nodes of the week, and neither of the anonymous replies seems to have gone sub-zero is a reasonable indicator of how things have fared among the rest of the community.

    Good point. I'll be waiting for the answer about how to solve the problem in my earlier reply, though.

    -lem, but some call me fokat