in reply to Re: Re: Script Review...
in thread Script Review...

But what is the motivation for peer review in this case? Sure they want to present the best possible code to give the best possible impression and hopefully get the job. But the fact is, the code is being cleaned up in a last minute review process and may not be an accurate reflection of the capabilities of the interviewee. If I were the interviewer and this fact wasn't made clear up front, and I later logged in to perlmonks to see this thread, that person would be out of the running.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Script Review...
by allolex (Curate) on Oct 26, 2003 at 07:46 UTC

    Employers generally expect the applicant to submit code that has previously been reviewed, much like they expect the application to have been proofread. Employers are interested in getting a Good Value from the programmers they hire and if those programmers can increase their value by asking questions on PerlMonks.org, then more power to them---it's free training and mentoring. As for the issue of whether this is a real reflection of the programmer's ability, this is precisely the reason employers do technical interviews in which they ask their applicants to spontaneously write code.

Re: Re: Re: Re: Script Review...
by draxil42 (Initiate) on Oct 26, 2003 at 13:49 UTC
    If I was changing my code I would agree with you! I don't want someone elses code to talk about anyway. My purpose is to be prepared for critisism and analysis of my code. Personally I don't that having a perfect piece of code perfected by the perl monks would get me a job, it's the talking about it that's the issue. But, yeah I should have been more clear.