Re: Naming a Mail Action Module

grew out of the same base idea: an e-mail can be an RPC call to a remote program. Consequently, they share quite a bit of code.

It sounds to me like you have the basis of the name in your first sentence. Mail::RPC. Thats pretty clear what it does. :-)

Also, it sounds like a Mail/MIME/SMTP implementation of a CGI::Application, so perhaps Mail::Application?

---
demerphq

_{First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

-- Gandhi}

Comment on Re: Naming a Mail Action Module Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^2: Naming a Mail Action Module by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Nov 01, 2003 at 07:23 UTC
I'll second the Mail::Application proposition. Makeshifts last the longest.	[reply]
Re: Re: Naming a Mail Action Module by sauoq (Abbot) on Nov 01, 2003 at 19:17 UTC
And I'll second Mail::RPC. I think Mail::Application is a little too generic. Someone might think it would provide a framework for writing an MUA for instance. -sauoq "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";	[reply]