in reply to Re: Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?
in thread Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?
I did notice that, many people (not all) from a unix/c background, tend to use threads over processes. I believe this is largely because unix/c thread has been very mature for quite a long time already, and on the same page, fork has been obsoleted in lots of those people's mind for quite a long time.
I acknowledge that Perl has its unique situation, however as Perl is largely based on c, I don't see a reason why Perl will not follow the same path, although the trend is just started.
If I didn't observe it wrong, Perl creators are pushing the use of Perl thread, and the more mature perl thread is, the more of this kind of push will come from them.
|
---|
Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
---|---|
Re: Re: Re: Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?
by Juerd (Abbot) on Nov 11, 2003 at 09:12 UTC | |
Re: Re: Re: Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?
by castaway (Parson) on Nov 11, 2003 at 12:18 UTC |