in reply to Re: Re: Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?
in thread Why use threads over processes, or why use processes over threads?
Empty childs (Fw) 0: 0.01 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.02 elapsed (Fi) 0: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.01 elapsed (Tj) 0: 0.05 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.06 elapsed (Td) 0: 0.05 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.06 elapsed (Fw) 5: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.01 elapsed (Fi) 5: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.02 elapsed (Tj) 5: 0.11 user, 0.02 system, 0:00.14 elapsed (Td) 5: 0.12 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.14 elapsed (Fw) 10: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.03 elapsed (Fi) 10: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.03 elapsed (Tj) 10: 0.20 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.24 elapsed (Td) 10: 0.21 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.24 elapsed (Fw) 25: 0.00 user, 0.06 system, 0:00.10 elapsed (Fi) 25: 0.01 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.09 elapsed (Tj) 25: 0.45 user, 0.47 system, 0:01.32 elapsed (Td) 25: 0.42 user, 0.04 system, 0:00.58 elapsed (Fw) 50: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.11 elapsed (Fi) 50: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.16 elapsed (Tj) 50: 0.86 user, 0.01 system, 0:01.07 elapsed (Td) 50: 0.79 user, 0.07 system, 0:01.00 elapsed (Fw) 100: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.21 elapsed (Fi) 100: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.35 elapsed (Tj) 100: 1.60 user, 0.12 system, 0:01.99 elapsed (Td) 100: 1.62 user, 0.08 system, 0:01.99 elapsed (Fw) 250: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.50 elapsed (Fi) 250: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.85 elapsed (Tj) 250: 4.20 user, 0.23 system, 0:05.18 elapsed (Td) 250: 4.28 user, 0.20 system, 0:05.22 elapsed (Fw) 500: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:01.01 elapsed (Fi) 500: 0.02 user, 0.04 system, 0:01.73 elapsed (Tj) 500: 9.09 user, 0.56 system, 0:11.28 elapsed (Td) 500: 9.19 user, 0.46 system, 0:11.25 elapsed (Fw) 1000: 0.01 user, 0.01 system, 0:02.02 elapsed (Fi) 1000: 0.02 user, 0.12 system, 0:03.47 elapsed A thread exited while 48 threads were running. (Tj) 1000: 17.54 user, 14.73 system, 3:07.04 elapsed (Td) 1000: 22.57 user, 23.33 system, 4:38.73 elapsed Childs writing (Fw) 0: 0.03 user, 0.07 system, 0:01.50 elapsed (Fi) 0: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.01 elapsed (Tj) 0: 0.03 user, 0.04 system, 0:00.83 elapsed (Td) 0: 0.05 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.06 elapsed (Fw) 5: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.02 elapsed (Fi) 5: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.02 elapsed (Tj) 5: 0.12 user, 0.02 system, 0:00.17 elapsed (Td) 5: 0.11 user, 0.02 system, 0:00.14 elapsed (Fw) 10: 0.01 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.03 elapsed (Fi) 10: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.04 elapsed (Tj) 10: 0.19 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.23 elapsed (Td) 10: 0.20 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.26 elapsed (Fw) 25: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.06 elapsed (Fi) 25: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.09 elapsed (Tj) 25: 0.41 user, 0.04 system, 0:00.53 elapsed (Td) 25: 0.45 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.53 elapsed (Fw) 50: 0.01 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.11 elapsed (Fi) 50: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.18 elapsed (Tj) 50: 0.81 user, 0.07 system, 0:01.03 elapsed (Td) 50: 0.79 user, 0.07 system, 0:01.01 elapsed (Fw) 100: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.21 elapsed (Fi) 100: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.34 elapsed (Tj) 100: 1.63 user, 0.11 system, 0:02.05 elapsed (Td) 100: 1.63 user, 0.09 system, 0:01.99 elapsed (Fw) 250: 0.02 user, 0.01 system, 0:00.52 elapsed (Fi) 250: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:00.85 elapsed (Tj) 250: 4.22 user, 0.31 system, 0:05.29 elapsed (Td) 250: 4.28 user, 0.20 system, 0:05.24 elapsed (Fw) 500: 0.02 user, 0.00 system, 0:01.01 elapsed (Fi) 500: 0.01 user, 0.03 system, 0:01.71 elapsed (Tj) 500: 9.38 user, 0.51 system, 0:11.50 elapsed (Td) 500: 9.16 user, 0.54 system, 0:11.28 elapsed (Fw) 1000: 0.01 user, 0.00 system, 0:02.01 elapsed (Fi) 1000: 0.02 user, 0.13 system, 0:03.49 elapsed A thread exited while 51 threads were running. (Tj) 1000: 17.47 user, 15.01 system, 2:34.14 elapsed (Td) 1000: 22.57 user, 23.21 system, 5:01.54 elapsed
Abigail
|
---|