Anonymous is pure noise.
Indeed. These, for example:here, here,
here, and here. All of which (and many more) have good content
and are rated more highly than your highest rated node.
| [reply] |
why could he not post as bluebell?
I'm sure he could. And, he could post his next node as redbell, and a followup as tinkerbell. The following day he could post as libertybell, bellcurve, and bigben (well, that last one might be a little close to home for tilly, and best avoided.)
In other words, when someone uses a registered account, he is doing so for his own convenience, not yours.
Having an Anonymous Monk account is also a convenience. It is convenient for people that want to post anonymously. It is convenient for people that just stop by and don't want to register an account. It's also a convenient way to reduce the number of orphaned accounts.
-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";
| [reply] |
It's also a convenient way to reduce the number of orphaned accounts
Then how do you explain - 5068 - Users Never Logged in
- 12846 - Logged In Once, No Write Ups
out of a possible 25763 total users. (i.e. more than half of the total users seem to be orphaned users..? In fact only 7849 users who have contributed..?)
-----
Of all the things I've lost in my life, its my mind I miss the most.
| [reply] |
| [reply] |
if you don't want to play the XP game, go to your preferences and turn off the damn nodelet. presto!
You cannot turn off the xp nodelet. And oh yeah, presto!
| [reply] |
I missed this thread originally, but let me answer your question a bit late.
do people actully believe that tilly had to post as Anonymous? why could he not post as bluebell?
I believed (still do in fact) that my posting style is distinctive enough that any alternate account would have quickly been recognized to be me. In fact a couple of people made a game of figuring out which anonymous posts were me, and would email me as they spotted them. (They caught a surprising portion and weren't often wrong.)
Identity in an online forum is more complex than you would think. | [reply] |