in reply to Re: A Luser's Benchmarking Tale
in thread A Luser's Benchmarking Tale
Good point regarding the caching (and one I hadn't considered). I'd taken in the point about 'big_sub' (hence the name ;)
Still, when all's said and done, and even if caching wasn't an issue, I don't think I could bare to read a file more times than is strictly necessary - call it an aesthetic prejudice ;)
|
|---|