in reply to Re: No Anonymous Reply Option
in thread No Anonymous Reply Option
You seem confused about the point of this thread and your position about it. It is not about ignoring Anonymous Monk, it is about being able to ban him. You are also missing the fact that ignoring Anonymous Monk will do you exactly no good at all in ignoring signed trolls. This means Abigail does not want to prohibit Anonymous Monk posting, because then all trolls will be signed, and he will have achieved the opposite of what he was after in the first place. I hope you are now in the clear about your own intentions.
Makeshifts last the longest.
|
|---|
| Replies are listed 'Best First'. | |
|---|---|
|
Re: No Anonymous Reply Option
by Abigail-II (Bishop) on Nov 26, 2003 at 10:52 UTC | |
by Aristotle (Chancellor) on Nov 26, 2003 at 11:04 UTC |