Thank you Monks, I wish I could contribute back some expertise, but perhaps from the nature of my post my solutions to problems might perhaps be pretty out there.
Given our project, the scripts we want to create have pretty basic execution paths and so it is feasible to execute them to "touch" the nodes that we want to keep in the tree. I'll have a burl at the Monk suggestion to this effect above.
I think the solution posted above this was a suggestion to use AUTOLOAD to boot only the code we want. My proposition is to produce a Perl text file which has been derived from a very large collection of shared libraries. Maybe I can use AUTOLOAD to read only the code we want, then use Deparse to "export" it. This would then give us only the code we want. Is this the implication?
We are doing this because the OOP heirarchy we use is really vast and we want to spit out Perl files which should be very short and hopefully fairly boring and readable. At the moment they are pretty elaborate.
As a side note, I have seen Deparse used to help de-obfuscate code. We also think this might be a good exercise as we can then audit the little scripts which are the end-point of our Perl script-writing package.
Best,
bobajobRob | [reply] |
| [reply] |