in reply to /msg me the reason of --

Would the /msg say it came from Jenda when you put your reason in there..

What would stop some-one from revenge downvoting if they disagreed with the reasons you downvoted their post..

I think too much emphasis is placed on the voting subject.. although I do like to see that people respond to my posts with ++.

Update: I ++ this node as I like to see people thinking about how to improve/grow/enhance Perlmonks.

Update1: I would also like to know when some-one has downvoted my node but only if it was because the content was wrong. If some-one doesnt like the way I answer questions or they don't like the pic on my homenode, I don't really want to know.

-----
Of all the things I've lost in my life, its my mind I miss the most.

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: /msg me the reason of --
by Jenda (Abbot) on Dec 01, 2003 at 15:08 UTC
    1. Yes. I don't care about the reasons for downvotes (or upvotes) from anonyms.
    2. Nothing. The point is ... the XPs themselves are not really important. The fact that the way I speak annoys people or that something I wrote is simply wrong is. I don't care about revenge downvotes.
    3. The reason is more important than the vote. To me at least :-)

    Jenda
    Always code as if the guy who ends up maintaining your code will be a violent psychopath who knows where you live.
       -- Rick Osborne

    Edit by castaway: Closed small tag in signature

[reply]

      You say that the reason for the downvote is the most important thing, but you also say that you're not interested in the reason behind the downvote if the voter would rather remain anonymous. I don't understand... why wouldn't you be interested in the reason just because you don't know which monk it's coming from? (Obviously the vote is not from Anonymous Monk since he is not allowed to vote.)

      -- Mike

      --
      XML::Simpler does not require XML::Parser or a SAX parser. It does require File::Slurp.
      -- grantm, perldoc XML::Simpler

[reply]
        I can think of a reason. You cannot correlate a vote from an anonymous person to other votes that person made. If you get six times a -- because "the voter doesn't like you", but you don't know who it's coming from, does that mean someone has a deep grudge against you? Or are you just generally unpopular.

        Also, if the -- vote is because "I don't understand the post", does that mean the voter is just picky, lacks knowledge, or whether your post is really unclear? If the voter is someone you think has a pretty decent knowledge, and doesn't use -- often, it's most likely the last reason. If the vote is anonymous, who knows?

        It's the same reason some people aren't interested in contributions of anonymous monk - the postings can't be put in a perspective. Same with anonymous vote reasons.

        Abigail

[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion