Re: Re: Re: Capturing everything after an optional character in a regex?

Well, it meets the original requirements as I understood them. See my previous reply to saouq's node for part of the reason (besides laziness and stupidity on my part)---It's nice to see that I'm not the only one who doesn't read the whole thread before posting ;) For the record, davido /msg'd me concerning this about three seconds after I hit 'create'... Even at past 2 a.m. his time, he was more alert than me.

--
Allolex

Comment on Re: Re: Re: Capturing everything after an optional character in a regex? Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re4: Capturing everything after an optional character in a regex? (not your fault) by sauoq (Abbot) on Dec 04, 2003 at 21:04 UTC
Well, it meets the original requirements as I understood them. And you shouldn't fault yourself either. You can't be expected to understand the requirements any better than they are communicated. In this case, they were very poorly communicated. For that matter, we still haven't been given enough information to answer this with confidence. I have asked for a restatement. We'll see if we get one. -sauoq "My two cents aren't worth a dime.";	[reply]

Replies are listed 'Best First'.

Re4: Capturing everything after an optional character in a regex? (not your fault)
by sauoq (Abbot) on Dec 04, 2003 at 21:04 UTC

Well, it meets the original requirements as I understood them.

And you shouldn't fault yourself either. You can't be expected to understand the requirements any better than they are communicated. In this case, they were very poorly communicated. For that matter, we still haven't been given enough information to answer this with confidence. I have asked for a restatement. We'll see if we get one.

-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";

[reply]