I use Flash a lot. I do all the animations where I work.
I don't like this idea because you can't but include actionscript files in compile time, so all the time that I'm going to spend learning a certain API to generate actionscripts, I could write the actual script instead.
I do use perl to generate lots of redundant actionscripts because I'm lazy. But until I can include actions on runtime -- something like perl's eval -- I don't see quite a big added value in this process.
I think my main point is roughly like the point that people make about generating HTML with CGI.pm
He who asks will be a fool for five minutes, but he who doesn't ask will remain a fool for life.
Chady | http://chady.net/
| [reply] [d/l] |
Which is why people use HTML::Template..
(I have no idea where this metaphor is going!)
| [reply] |
If this is your itch to scratch, then go ahead and do it.
Personally, I don't like Flash, and could care less if Perl could access it or not. Then again, people write a lot of modules that I fundamently dislike (such as Inline::Java), and I don't particularly care as long as I don't have to maintain code that uses it.
---- I wanted to explore how Perl's closures can be manipulated, and ended up creating an object system by accident.
-- Schemer
: () { :|:& };:
Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated
| [reply] [d/l] |
| [reply] [d/l] |