in reply to Re: Re: Reputation for anonymous monks
in thread Reputation for anonymous monks

Yes I did. I understand your suggestion, and the concern (or rather the reason it didn't come to pass before) is that monks would be checking the reputation of a node before they cast their votes, or nobody would vote ++ or --, they would just cast a null vote to see the a nodes reputation.

As for nothing of relevance in the 'null vote' search that you advocate, did you super search? I may have provided a link to a casual search, but I did say you should super search. I did and I found

MJD says "you can't just make shit up and expect the computer to know what you mean, retardo!"
I run a Win32 PPM repository for perl 5.6.x and 5.8.x -- I take requests (README).
** The third rule of perl club is a statement of fact: pod is sexy.

  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Reputation for anonymous monks

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Reputation for anonymous monks
by jonnyfolk (Vicar) on Dec 08, 2003 at 11:18 UTC
    I would say that my suggestion is rather a halfway house between having the reputation on permanent view to all and the current system. A logged in Monk would have to go out of his/her way to view the reputation and so in most instances wouldn't bother, but the information would be available for those who wanted the information. There is also the point that AMs would be able to see the reputation that their contributions have accrued, which personally I see as a good thing.
[reply]

In Section Perl Monks Discussion