in reply to Reputation for anonymous monks

Personally I don't vote on AM nodes for this reason - it seems a bit of a wasted vote.

Why is it a wasted vote? Do you believe a vote is only worth something in its ability to affect the XP of a node's author? If you are voting to change the author's XP, how large a role does the author play in your voting decisions? It is best to vote on the content of a node regardless of who the author is. A vote on non-anonymous post may have a relatively small chance of causing a change in its author's XP anyway.

Regarding your idea in general, as others have pointed out, if we do this, we might as well display node rep all the time (or make it a user setting.) While I'm not entirely convinced that would be a bad idea, I do understand the arguments against it. In light of those, I still support the addition of an abstain option for people who chose to never vote on a node.

-sauoq
"My two cents aren't worth a dime.";

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Reputation for anonymous monks
by jonnyfolk (Vicar) on Dec 08, 2003 at 21:53 UTC

    Do you believe a vote is only worth something in its ability to affect the XP of a node's author?

    No. I believe a vote is a message from me to the author of the node. It is a means for me to say - " Yes - I agree" or "Ah, I hadn't looked at it that way". Accumulated reputation shows the trend of feeling by the users of the site about a particular node. If the author cannot see the reputation accrued then it is a wasted vote. In my opinion.

    The XP issue is entirely separate and though nice to have at the end of the day if you frequent the site over a long enough period you will reach sainthood so in my book that is the least of the issues to focus on.