Re^5: CGI/FTP security question

. . . does it having only two RFCs associated with it sound right to you?

I think there are a few others that are more "expermintal extentions". http://www.rfc-editor.org should be able to find them.

Also, does it support sessions?

Not in the protocol as defined, though sessions don't make sense in a protocol primarily used over UDP. Since you'll probably be doing it over TCP, it's probably worth adding.

Anyway, TFTP was just a suggestion. It may or may not be too much work to modify for your project.

----
I wanted to explore how Perl's closures can be manipulated, and ended up creating an object system by accident.
-- Schemer

: () { :|:& };:

Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated

Comment on Re^5: CGI/FTP security question Download Code

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re**6: CGI/FTP security question by dakedesu (Scribe) on Dec 13, 2003 at 07:59 UTC
From what little I've read of it, I think its simplicity is rather nice. I'll check out the experimental extensions, as I am sure that there might be something useful there too. From the looks, I only have to change the names of a few functions (I am using $AUTOLOAD in strange and wonderful ways) Read more... (478 Bytes)	[reply]