in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: (OT) Terminology Oriented Programming
in thread (OT) Terminology Oriented Programming

I would say most business/databasebase applications are not well modelled by OOD. That does not say such apps are intractable or even difficult to do in OO, just that contrary to popular wisdom and some large investment in OO languages for business applications, people are still left groping for a better way to model such applications.
  • Comment on Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (OT) Terminology Oriented Programming

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: (OT) Terminology Oriented Programming
by Anonymous Monk on Dec 13, 2003 at 06:40 UTC

    I think I understand where your coming from on this. The problems with making OO work with database applications are fairly well documented and have been the subject of a discussion here quite recently.

    To be really useful (to me), the problems need to be fairly clearly defined, specific examples. Preferably with an indication of what problems where encountered in modelling them using an OO regime.

      The OO/Database problem was summed up well by William Cook (paraphrasing, and I can't recall where I read it, perhaps quoted in one of Richard P. Gabriel's essays): The problem is that OO is about encapsulation of state and behavior but databases are about separating state and behavior.