Re: Regexp-Common and spam.
by hardburn (Abbot) on Dec 15, 2003 at 21:24 UTC
|
Maybe I should start using that as a slogan.
But then you would miss out on these great slogan-making oppertunities:
- Regexp-common, Ive got a show for you!
- Regexp-common reduced prices on printer cartiges!!!!
- Regexp-common on EbAy
- Inflate the size of your Regexp-common
- Regexp-common, you deserve a new job!
- RE:¿äûÇϽŠRegexp-common ¹«·á ½Åû¼ ÀÔ´Ï´Ù
This and many more, only $10.95! Visa and MasterCard accepted.
(Is that last one a poor use of character sets, or is it part of Regexp-common's source code? Hmmm.)
---- I wanted to explore how Perl's closures can be manipulated, and ended up creating an object system by accident.
-- Schemer
: () { :|:& };:
Note: All code is untested, unless otherwise stated
| [reply] [d/l] |
Re: Regexp-Common and spam.
by valdez (Monsignor) on Dec 15, 2003 at 21:35 UTC
|
So this a good way to capture your attention :) Please, can you add the italian zip codes to Regexp::Common::zip? They have always 5 digits (DDDDD form). First two digits identify province (for example 40 stands for Bologna, 65 stands for Pescara and 00 is Rome), third digit identifies the city if even, or a place in the province if odd; last two digits identify the delivery agency. There isn't any special rule. A complete example is:
65123 -> 65 Pescara
1 inside the city
23 Delivery Agency
Thank you very much!
update: I already mailed my request to Abigail many months ago, but I never received a reply... in the meanwhile my email address changed. | [reply] [d/l] |
|
|
I cannot recall receiving a request for Italian zip codes, but
it might have been eaten by my spam filter. Today I've added
Spanish zip codes; adding Italian zip codes shouldn't be a
problem. I hope to bring out a new release of Regexp::Common
before Christmas - but there's still a nasty bug in the new
code for ISBN codes.
Abigail
| [reply] |
|
|
| [reply] |
Re: Regexp-Common and spam.
by talexb (Chancellor) on Dec 15, 2003 at 21:46 UTC
|
As long as Regexp-common left the head[er] alone, no problem at all.
--t. alex
Life is short: get busy!
| [reply] |
Re: Regexp-Common and spam.
by princepawn (Parson) on Dec 15, 2003 at 20:29 UTC
|
Did you ever get any email from me (Terrence Brannon) at that email address? I sent in some code for US profanity checking but never got a reply from you.
I ended up posting the code separately as Regexp::Common::profanity_us
PApp::SQL and
CGI::Application rock the house
| [reply] |
|
|
I don't recall ever getting an email about that, nor can I
find an email from you about profanity in my archive. I
vaguely recall Regexp::Common::profanity_us be mentioned in
some public forum, but I don't know about the details.
Abigail
| [reply] |
Re: Regexp-Common and spam.
by mcogan1966 (Monk) on Dec 16, 2003 at 20:04 UTC
|
And let's not forget...
- Regexp-common left my mouth clean and minty fresh!
- Regexp-common, guaranteed to remove ugly soap scum.
- Regexp-common, the quicker-picker-upper.
- Regexp-common, use it...or else!
- Regexp-common, it's not just for breakfast anymore.
I could go on, but I won't. | [reply] |
|
|
Not to mention...
- Use Regexp-Common to increase your size by inches.
xenchu
The Needs of the World and my Talents run parallel to infinity.
| [reply] [d/l] |
Re: Regexp-Common and spam.
by Tuppence (Pilgrim) on Dec 19, 2003 at 17:13 UTC
|
Maybe you should.
Because you mentioned it here, I looked at it last night. Oh, wow. I must now go hurridly infect every perl coder I know. Excuse me.
| [reply] |