in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Sharing the scalar love?
in thread Sharing the scalar love?

Note: someone reply to my bad usage of @S::ISA. Someone prolly knows of a better way of doing this with strict on :)
Howabout (for perl 5.6.0 and up): 
package S;
our @ISA = qw(Exporter);

[download]
Or use vars qw(@ISA) for older perls.

At least it doesn't make you type the package name, which is error prone, since it creates a new package if you spell it wrong.

Joost.

"What should it profit a man, if he should win a flame war, yet lose his cool?"

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re^5: Sharing the scalar love?
by NetWallah (Canon) on Dec 22, 2003 at 22:43 UTC
    In order to use an unqualified "$x" in the caller, I had to code the "S" (S.pm) module thus (The examples provided above gave Syntax errors): 
    package S;

use strict;
use warnings;
use Exporter; #"require" works too, but use is more std.

our @ISA = qw(Exporter);
our @EXPORT = qw($x);

our $x = 999;
1;

    [download]
    "When you are faced with a dilemma, might as well make dilemmanade. "
[reply]
[d/l]
A reply falls below the community's threshold of quality. You may see it by logging in.

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom