in reply to CPAN: install programs and namespaces

Well, I suppose someone ought to give a not-CPAN point of view. For me, the app-on-CPAN thing should be pretty much dictated by extensibility of the software in question. For example, CGI::KWiki was designed to be quite simple but also extensible.

IMO, if the app you've written is something which could feasibly work as the underpinning of something else, then I would put it up. But, in this instance I don't think that's the case. But I'm mostly against the apps-on-CPAN thing anyway: I would much prefer to see a separate directory of apps written in Perl. The namespace problem you outline is one of the reasons; that doesn't affect just where you put the files but also where one might look to find something. Unless apps are placed somewhere suitable in the hierarchy, it would be difficult to see how the search would work: Freshmeat, for example, has categories and all sorts of things, CPAN doesn't.

  • Comment on Re: CPAN: install programs and namespaces

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: CPAN: install programs and namespaces
by legLess (Hermit) on Jan 03, 2004 at 21:34 UTC

    That's a really good point, and not one I'd considered. I've worked with Kwiki's code quite a bit, and use it's Formatter class to allow wiki-style formatting in text fields. I've considered making Taskcard a plugin, and I'll investigate this more when Brian releases the plugin API.

    That said, I hope to continue making Taskcard more generic and extensible. You've given me something to ponder; thanks.