in reply to Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In need of a stupid regex trick
in thread In need of a stupid regex trick

These are the results of the Belgian Jury: 
$VAR1 = 'one';
$VAR2 = '"two';
$VAR3 = 'three"';
$VAR4 = ' four five ';
$VAR5 = '"six';
$VAR6 = 'seven';
$VAR7 = 'eight"';
$VAR8 = 'nine';

[download]

It seems your regex is missing the first " and then is off by 1 for all the others.

Sorry about the bad "Eurovision Song Contest" joke

CountZero

"If you have four groups working on a compiler, you'll get a 4-pass compiler." - Conway's Law

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: In need of a stupid regex trick
by demerphq (Chancellor) on Jan 09, 2004 at 03:12 UTC

    I finally got the time to get perl installed and ive worked out what is wrong. It seems that pos isn't updated when the look ahead assertion is matched. So even though the " was matched the next match on /g didnt start _after_ the second quote, but _at_ the second quote. Thus the odd behaviour of treating the second unquoted section as if it were quoted. Or at least thats how I read this. All very interesting. Thanks for the repeated feedback...

    :-)


    ---
    demerphq

      First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
      -- Gandhi

[reply]
[d/l]

In Section Seekers of Perl Wisdom