in reply to Two Rules for Online Bliss
in thread Let's discuss Podmaster's Signature

http://www.wps.com/FidoNet/source/Fido-FidoNet/Fido-pre-12/policy3.doc.TXT

Search for "judicial philosophy"

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
Re: Re: Two Rules for Online Bliss
by jdtoronto (Prior) on Jan 07, 2004 at 21:03 UTC
    And when I did I found this other little gem there as well: blockquote>"Judge not, lest ye be judged!" Which I thought was rather appropriate. Later yesterday I was having some struggles with a module and I looked for alternatives. One is maintained by princepawn, the other is not. Guess which I chose.

    My decision is undoubtedly unfair. May not be in my best interests and is no doubt a technological step backwards. But do I want to be relying on some-one who is so quick to judge? I refer not only to this thread, but also the "battle" with chromatic, tilly and others after the appearance of the perl.com article on DBIx::Recordset a couple of years ago.

    I'm sorry princepawn but every time I read posts of yours I sense a very negative energy. Every time I have something to do with C::DBI, CGI::A or other module authors I contact it is a very rewarding experience. I can't take the risk on a sometimes belligerant maintainer for something I rely on.

    jdtoronto