RE (tilly) 4: sort performance

When faced with the ridiculous, look for the obvious. If you change all three to use the same kind of sort, Schwartz runs faster than the other two.

*sigh*

(Stupid user tricks.)

Comment on RE (tilly) 4: sort performance

Replies are listed 'Best First'.
RE: RE (tilly) 4: sort performance by tye (Sage) on Sep 12, 2000 at 08:01 UTC
I get "schartz" 5%-30% faster than "straight" with "tye" (which you didn't time) being 50%-100% faster still (all using "cmp"). (: - tye (but my friends call me "Tye")	[reply]